[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB6DaTNSGtbgdbeg0MUK44MM1xfcA6HgNCCxJ4Ownat87Gnr_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:59:47 +0200
From: Sorin Dumitru <dumitru.sorin87@...il.com>
To: Daniel Baluta <dbaluta@...acom.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
acme@...stprotocols.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: check if address is in range
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Daniel Baluta <dbaluta@...acom.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Sorin Dumitru
> <dumitru.sorin87@...il.com> wrote:
>> When addr isn't in the [sym->start,sym->end] range offset
>> will be a very big value, giving us a segfault when we do:
>> h->addr[offset]++
>> Fix this by checking that addr is in the correct range.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sorin Dumitru <dumitru.sorin87@...il.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> index 011ed26..4ddc55f 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ int symbol__inc_addr_samples(struct symbol *sym, struct map *map,
>>
>> pr_debug3("%s: addr=%#" PRIx64 "\n", __func__, map->unmap_ip(map, addr));
>>
>> - if (addr >= sym->end)
>> + if (addr <= sym->start || addr >= sym->end)
>> return 0;
>
> Shouldn't this be addr < sym->start ?
>
> thanks,
> Daniel.
You're right, i resent the patch.
Thanks,
Sorin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists