linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: Improve filesystem freezing handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120112231513.GH8778@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:15:13 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	xfs@....sgi.com, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
	Surbhi Palande <csurbhi@...il.com>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: Improve filesystem freezing handling

On Thu 12-01-12 16:57:42, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 1/11/12 7:20 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > @@ -183,6 +186,13 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type)
> >  		s->s_shrink.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
> >  		s->s_shrink.shrink = prune_super;
> >  		s->s_shrink.batch = 1024;
> > +
> > +		init_waitqueue_head(&s->s_writers_wait);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +		s->s_page_faults = alloc_percpu(int);
> 
> isn't this s->s_writers?  s->s_page_faults isn't defined anywhere.
  Right. Leftover from original implementation and since I was doing
initial testing only using UML, I didn't spot this. Thanks.

> > +#endif
> > +		lockdep_init_map(&s->s_writers_lock_map, "sb_writers",
> > +				 &sb_writers_key, 0);
> >  	}
> >  out:
> >  	return s;
> > @@ -1126,6 +1136,84 @@ out:
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > + * sb_start_write - drop write access to a superblock
>       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> s/b sb_end_write
  Fixed.

> > @@ -1136,6 +1224,7 @@ out:
> >  int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb)
> >  {
> >  	int ret;
> > +	int writers;
> >  
> >  	atomic_inc(&sb->s_active);
> >  	down_write(&sb->s_umount);
> > @@ -1151,8 +1240,36 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb)
> >  		return 0;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	rwsem_acquire(&sb->s_writers_lock_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_);
> >  	sb->s_frozen = SB_FREEZE_WRITE;
> > -	smp_wmb();
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Now wait for all page faults to finish. ->page_mkwrite()
> > +	 * implementations must call vfs_check_frozen() before starting
> > +	 * a fault so that we cannot livelock here. Because of that we
> > +	 * are guaranteed that from this moment on new ->page_mkwrite()
> > +	 * calls will block and we just have to wait for s_page_faults
> 
> wait for s_writers, right?
  Yes. Fixed.

  Thanks for review.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/