[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F0FFA58.7010702@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:33:12 +0800
From: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Barry Song <Barry.Song@....com>
CC: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, workgroup.linux@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Xiangzhen Ye <Xiangzhen.Ye@....com>,
Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: pwm_bl: move suspend/resume entries from platform_driver
to driver.pm
On 12/01/2011 09:53 AM, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Xiangzhen Ye <Xiangzhen.Ye@....com>
>
> At first, people are moving suspend/resume entries from platform_driver
> to driver.pm for many drivers.
> On the other hand, if we use swsusp to do hibernation for an embedded
> system using pwm_bl, in the process of preparing snapshot, backlight
> will be off and make lcd black screen. This gives bad user experiences.
> This patch will fix this issue as swsusp will go to call pm.freeze()
> but not platform_driver.suspend. we have no pm.freeze() for pwm_bl, so
> the lcd black screen will disappear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiangzhen Ye <Xiangzhen.Ye@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> index 8b5b2a4..50f3134 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> @@ -169,9 +169,9 @@ static int pwm_backlight_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> -static int pwm_backlight_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - pm_message_t state)
> +static int pwm_backlight_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> struct backlight_device *bl = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct pwm_bl_data *pb = dev_get_drvdata(&bl->dev);
>
> @@ -184,8 +184,9 @@ static int pwm_backlight_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int pwm_backlight_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int pwm_backlight_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> struct backlight_device *bl = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> backlight_update_status(bl);
> @@ -196,15 +197,19 @@ static int pwm_backlight_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
> #define pwm_backlight_resume NULL
> #endif
>
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops pwm_backlight_pm_ops = {
> + .suspend = pwm_backlight_suspend,
> + .resume = pwm_backlight_resume,
> +};
Why not use SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS instead?
Thanks
-Wanlong Gao
> +
> static struct platform_driver pwm_backlight_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "pwm-backlight",
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .pm = &pwm_backlight_pm_ops,
> },
> .probe = pwm_backlight_probe,
> .remove = pwm_backlight_remove,
> - .suspend = pwm_backlight_suspend,
> - .resume = pwm_backlight_resume,
> };
>
> static int __init pwm_backlight_init(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists