linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 4/9] of: add clock providers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120113143832.GA1940@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:38:36 +0800
From:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 4/9] of: add clock providers

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 08:05:21AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 01/13/2012 07:50 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 03:02:04PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> +==Clock providers==
> >> +
> >> +Required properties:
> >> +#clock-cells:	   Number of cells in a clock specifier; typically will be
> >> +		   set to 1
> > 
> > Shouldn't it be 0 typically, which means it represents only one clock
> > in the node?
> > 
> 
> We have no idea what will be typical. I would say: Typically 0 for nodes
> with a single clock output and 1 for nodes with multiple clock outputs.
> 
That's definitely better to me.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/