[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120113182433.GB30411@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:24:33 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] driver core merge for 3.3
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 02:39:27AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 02:11, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Big thing here, that caused all of the merge issues, is the removal of
> >> the sysdev code. It has been long needed to be removed, Kay finally
> >> just did it, thankfully. There are patches pending that take advantage
> >> of this, providing properly CPU hotplug driver loading support, that
> >> will have to wait until 3.4, as they didn't make the merge window in
> >> time. Note, the sysdev code isn't removed from the tree just yet, to
> >> help catch any other tree that might not have noticed this in the
> >> linux-next merge process. I'll send a follow-on patch after 3.3-rc1 is
> >> out that removes this code, after ensuring that no other in-tree code is
> >> using the sysdev structures.
> >
> > Hmm. I think this is the cause of one of the suspend/resume problems I'm seeing:
> >
> > Device 'machinecheck3' does not have a releae() function, it is
> > broken and must be fixed
> >
> > that's the WARN_ON() in drivers/base/core.c (line 192), and it comes
> > from disable_nonboot_cpus() doing the whole device_unregister() thing.
> >
> > Afaik, it's arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c.
>
> I guess this kind of warning just did not exist for the old sysdev
> devices. The 'machinecheck' devices are DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct device,
> mce_device) devices, so we will probably just add a dummy release
> function, which might not fix the problem you are seeing.
Shouldn't we have a "real" release function here for when we remove
sysdev devices? The cpu hotplug code should remove them, as should
unloading the kernel module here.
Care to make up a patch?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists