[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7FE21149F4667147B645348EC605788508FBDB@039-SN2MPN1-013.039d.mgd.msft.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 06:25:26 +0000
From: Dong Aisheng-B29396 <B29396@...escale.com>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
CC: "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/15] sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c: add missing iounmap
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Julia Lawall
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 5:55 PM
> To: Liam Girdwood
> Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org; Mark Brown; Jaroslav Kysela; Takashi Iwai;
> alsa-devel@...a-project.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/15] sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c: add missing iounmap
>
> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> Add missing iounmap in error handling code, in a case where the function already
> preforms iounmap on some other execution path.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression e;
> statement S,S1;
> int ret;
> @@
> e = \(ioremap\|ioremap_nocache\)(...)
> ... when != iounmap(e)
> if (<+...e...+>) S
> ... when any
> when != iounmap(e)
> *if (...)
> { ... when != iounmap(e)
> return ...; }
> ... when any
> iounmap(e);
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> ---
> sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c b/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c index
> 049e543..5ee0adb 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c
> @@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ static int mxs_saif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = -ENODEV;
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get dma resource: %d\n",
> ret);
> - goto failed_ioremap;
> + goto failed_get_resource;
> }
> saif->dma_param.chan_num = dmares->start;
>
> @@ -739,6 +739,7 @@ failed_register:
> failed_get_irq2:
> free_irq(saif->irq, saif);
> failed_get_irq1:
> +failed_get_resource:
There's already a 'failed_get_resource' there, wouldn't your change break
The original code?
BTW, I guess a better way is that you can submit a patch to change the driver
To use devm_alloc_* and it's friend routines, then we do not need to fix
Such things any more.
Regards
Dong Aisheng
> iounmap(saif->base);
> failed_ioremap:
> release_mem_region(iores->start, resource_size(iores));
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the
> body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists