linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap()ed address is invalid"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:31:33 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc:	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Huang Ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap()ed
 address is invalid"

* Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:

> Ping?

Would be nice to have testing from Keith as your fix looks more 
attractive than the plain revert.

I could queue up the fix blindly and do a double revert if it 
breaks, but i already strongly depleted my problematic-tree 
quota for this cycle, so i'd rather have a nice Tested-by tag 
from Keith ... ;-)

Failing that i guess we'll have to do the revert, and re-try the 
original commit with your fix merged into it.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/