[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F13F10F.7030606@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:42:39 -0600
From: Alejandro del Rio <scasbyte@...il.com>
To: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.it>
CC: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, guenter.roeck@...csson.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (w83627ehf) Add GPIO port 3 functionality
Hi Rodolfo,
On 15-Jan-12 4:53 AM, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 04:15:08PM -0600, Alejandro wrote:
>>
>> The patch looks great, and it is definitely more maintainable. I'll
>> create a patch for the w83627ehf driver and send it as soon as
>> possible. Should I make the patch for the w83627hf or wait for
>> Rodolfo???
>
> I already sent a new version of my patches... here you can find a copy
> of my message:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/lm-sensors/msg33656.html
>
> Please, ask to me whatever you need since I'd like very much these
> patches will be added to the kernel main tree! :)
>
> Ciao,
>
> Rodolfo
The patch as it is posted on "lm-sensors/msg33656.html" mailing list
does not apply to the latest tree. After making some changes it applies
cleanly to 3.2 tree. The issues were:
-The gpio naming convention is now "gpio-[name of the driver]" instead
of "[name of driver]_gpio"
-Line changes in the Kconfig
-Some email addresses converted to @xxxxxxx (by the lm-sensors mailing
list I guess)
Please look at the attachments for the new patches (I take no credit for
the changes as it was a trivial clean-up), if you like the changes I
would recommend starting a new thread on this list to get reviews.
Note: I couldn't test the driver because my platform has not an HF chip
but the patch looks good so far =)
BR!
Alex
View attachment "0001-temporal-change.txt" of type "text/plain" (12601 bytes)
View attachment "0002-temporal-change.txt" of type "text/plain" (12923 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists