linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND, PATCH 6/6] memcg: cleanup memcg_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:59:57 +0200
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [RESEND, PATCH 6/6] memcg: cleanup memcg_check_events()

On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:41:08PM +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:57:52PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>

...

> I'm about to remove the soft limit part of this code, so we'll be able
> to condense this back into a single #if block again, anyway.
> 
> I would much prefer having the extra #if in the code over this patch
> just to silence the warning for now.

The patch is informative only. I agree with Michal Hocko. It introduce too
much noise to fix one warning. Just ignore it.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/