[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120116164424.GA19621@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:44:24 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya.rohm@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, jdmason@...zu.us,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pch_gbe: Use a randomly generated MAC instead of
failing probe
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 08:35:09AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 1/16/2012 8:20 AM, David Laight wrote:
> > Since multiple interfaces on a single system are unlikely
> > to be connected to the same LAN segment, it doesn't really
> > matter if they use same MAC address.
> I think you missed the point. All embedded devices have the same fs, so
> if you have 2 boxes of the same model/brand on the same network, they'd
> have the same MAC. That's generally frowned upon by network
> administrators ;-)
This is generally handled by putting the MAC into a board-specific bit
of flash that isn't part the main firmware (for example, the bootloader
configuration) - for a lot of applications random generation doesn't
help that much as entropy is hard to come by.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists