[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120116184519.345383502@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:45:10 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: [43/48] slub: fix a possible memleak in __slab_alloc()
3.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
commit 73736e0387ba0e6d2b703407b4d26168d31516a7 upstream.
Zhihua Che reported a possible memleak in slub allocator on
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y builds.
It is possible current thread migrates right before disabling irqs in
__slab_alloc(). We must check again c->freelist, and perform a normal
allocation instead of scratching c->freelist.
Many thanks to Zhihua Che for spotting this bug, introduced in 2.6.39
V2: Its also possible an IRQ freed one (or several) object(s) and
populated c->freelist, so its not a CONFIG_PREEMPT only problem.
Reported-by: Zhihua Che <zhihua.che@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
mm/slub.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2077,6 +2077,11 @@ static void *__slab_alloc(struct kmem_ca
goto new_slab;
}
+ /* must check again c->freelist in case of cpu migration or IRQ */
+ object = c->freelist;
+ if (object)
+ goto load_freelist;
+
stat(s, ALLOC_SLOWPATH);
do {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists