linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] proc: clear_refs: do not clear reserved pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:19:43 -0500 (EST)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"moussaba@...ron.com" <moussaba@...ron.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] proc: clear_refs: do not clear reserved pages

On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, Will Deacon wrote:

> Hi Hugh,
> 
> Thanks for the explanation.
> 
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 05:36:37PM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > I'm not saying the horrible hack gate_vma mechanism is any safer
> > than yours (the latest bug in it was fixed all of 13 days ago).
> > But I am saying that one horrible hack is safer than two.

Absolutely.

> Something like what I've got below seems to do the trick, and clear_refs
> also seems to behave when it's presented with the gate_vma. If Russell is
> happy with the approach, we can move to the gate_vma in the future.

I like it much better, although I haven't tested it fully yet.

However your patch is missing the worst of the current ARM hack I would 
be glad to see go as follows:

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index 71605d9f8e..876e545297 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/cachetype.h>
 #include <asm/proc-fns.h>
+#include <asm-generic/mm_hooks.h>
 
 void __check_kvm_seq(struct mm_struct *mm);
 
@@ -133,32 +135,4 @@ switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
 #define deactivate_mm(tsk,mm)	do { } while (0)
 #define activate_mm(prev,next)	switch_mm(prev, next, NULL)
 
-/*
- * We are inserting a "fake" vma for the user-accessible vector page so
- * gdb and friends can get to it through ptrace and /proc/<pid>/mem.
- * But we also want to remove it before the generic code gets to see it
- * during process exit or the unmapping of it would  cause total havoc.
- * (the macro is used as remove_vma() is static to mm/mmap.c)
- */
-#define arch_exit_mmap(mm) \
-do { \
-	struct vm_area_struct *high_vma = find_vma(mm, 0xffff0000); \
-	if (high_vma) { \
-		BUG_ON(high_vma->vm_next);  /* it should be last */ \
-		if (high_vma->vm_prev) \
-			high_vma->vm_prev->vm_next = NULL; \
-		else \
-			mm->mmap = NULL; \
-		rb_erase(&high_vma->vm_rb, &mm->mm_rb); \
-		mm->mmap_cache = NULL; \
-		mm->map_count--; \
-		remove_vma(high_vma); \
-	} \
-} while (0)
-
-static inline void arch_dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *oldmm,
-				 struct mm_struct *mm)
-{
-}
-
 #endif


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/