[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120116212050.GD5767@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:20:50 -0600
From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, x86@...nel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] x86 UV2: remove no-resources test for UV2 BAU
This patch removes an unnecessary test for a no-destination-resources-available
condition that looks like a destination timeout in UV1, but is separately
distinguishable in UV2.
Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
---
arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
Index: 120113.linux-3.2.1/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
===================================================================
--- 120113.linux-3.2.1.orig/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
+++ 120113.linux-3.2.1/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
@@ -642,16 +642,6 @@ static int uv2_wait_completion(struct ba
} else if (descriptor_stat == UV2H_DESC_DEST_TIMEOUT) {
stat->s_dtimeout++;
ttm = get_cycles();
- /*
- * Our retries may be blocked by all destination
- * swack resources being consumed, and a timeout
- * pending. In that case hardware returns the
- * ERROR that looks like a destination timeout.
- */
- if (cycles_2_us(ttm - bcp->send_message) < timeout_us) {
- bcp->conseccompletes = 0;
- return FLUSH_RETRY_PLUGGED;
- }
bcp->conseccompletes = 0;
return FLUSH_RETRY_TIMEOUT;
} else {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists