[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201201162321.38279.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:21:37 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] PM / Sleep: Introduce new phases of device suspend/resume
Hi,
On Friday, December 23, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On the request of some driver PM developers, that appears to have been quite
> popular lately, this series of patches adds new system suspend/resume (and
> hibernation/restore) callbacks to struct dev_pm_ops and makes the PM core
> use them during system power transitions.
>
> [1/2] - Introduce "late suspend" and "early resume" of devices.
> [2/2] - Introduce generic callbacks for new device PM phases.
>
> The series is on top of the linux-next branch of the linux-pm tree.
>
> These patches have been tested on Toshiba Portege R500 with openSUSE 12.1
> without crashing the box in the process, which looks promising. Also,
> they shouldn't actually have any impact on the existing setups other than
> adding a very short delay to the system suspend/resume code paths.
The patches have received some more testing since the were first posted and
I've added a PM domains patch on top of them:
[3/3] - Make generic PM domains use the new device suspend/resume phases.
The series applies on top of linux-pm/pm-for-linus (although it should
apply on top of the current mainline too).
I'm considering these patches as v3.4 material, if there are no objections.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists