lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:40:28 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
	Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	gouders@...bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de,
	Marcos Souza <marcos.mage@...il.com>, justinmattock@...il.com,
	Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mce: fix warning messages about static struct mce_device

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

When suspending, there was a large list of warnings going something like:

	Device 'machinecheck1' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed

This patch turns the static mce_devices into dynamically allocated, and
properly frees them when they are removed from the system.  It solves
the warning messages on my laptop here.

Reported-by: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---

Linus, this should fix the warnings on your laptop, it does on mine.

 include/asm/mce.h           |    2 +-
 kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c     |   18 ++++++++++++++----
 kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c |   18 +++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)


diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
index f35ce43..6aefb14 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static inline void enable_p5_mce(void) {}
 
 void mce_setup(struct mce *m);
 void mce_log(struct mce *m);
-DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct device, mce_device);
+extern struct device *mce_device[CONFIG_NR_CPUS];
 
 /*
  * Maximum banks number.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index 29ba329..5a11ae2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -1859,7 +1859,7 @@ static struct bus_type mce_subsys = {
 	.dev_name	= "machinecheck",
 };
 
-DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct device, mce_device);
+struct device *mce_device[CONFIG_NR_CPUS];
 
 __cpuinitdata
 void (*threshold_cpu_callback)(unsigned long action, unsigned int cpu);
@@ -2001,19 +2001,27 @@ static struct device_attribute *mce_device_attrs[] = {
 
 static cpumask_var_t mce_device_initialized;
 
+static void mce_device_release(struct device *dev)
+{
+	kfree(dev);
+}
+
 /* Per cpu device init. All of the cpus still share the same ctrl bank: */
 static __cpuinit int mce_device_create(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct device *dev = &per_cpu(mce_device, cpu);
+	struct device *dev;
 	int err;
 	int i, j;
 
 	if (!mce_available(&boot_cpu_data))
 		return -EIO;
 
-	memset(dev, 0, sizeof(struct device));
+	dev = kzalloc(sizeof *dev, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!dev)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 	dev->id  = cpu;
 	dev->bus = &mce_subsys;
+	dev->release = &mce_device_release;
 
 	err = device_register(dev);
 	if (err)
@@ -2030,6 +2038,7 @@ static __cpuinit int mce_device_create(unsigned int cpu)
 			goto error2;
 	}
 	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mce_device_initialized);
+	mce_device[cpu] = dev;
 
 	return 0;
 error2:
@@ -2046,7 +2055,7 @@ error:
 
 static __cpuinit void mce_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct device *dev = &per_cpu(mce_device, cpu);
+	struct device *dev = mce_device[cpu];
 	int i;
 
 	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mce_device_initialized))
@@ -2060,6 +2069,7 @@ static __cpuinit void mce_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	device_unregister(dev);
 	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mce_device_initialized);
+	mce_device[cpu] = NULL;
 }
 
 /* Make sure there are no machine checks on offlined CPUs. */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
index ba0b94a..786e76a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
@@ -523,6 +523,7 @@ static __cpuinit int threshold_create_bank(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int bank)
 {
 	int i, err = 0;
 	struct threshold_bank *b = NULL;
+	struct device *dev = mce_device[cpu];
 	char name[32];
 
 	sprintf(name, "threshold_bank%i", bank);
@@ -543,8 +544,7 @@ static __cpuinit int threshold_create_bank(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int bank)
 		if (!b)
 			goto out;
 
-		err = sysfs_create_link(&per_cpu(mce_device, cpu).kobj,
-					b->kobj, name);
+		err = sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, b->kobj, name);
 		if (err)
 			goto out;
 
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ static __cpuinit int threshold_create_bank(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int bank)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	b->kobj = kobject_create_and_add(name, &per_cpu(mce_device, cpu).kobj);
+	b->kobj = kobject_create_and_add(name, &dev->kobj);
 	if (!b->kobj)
 		goto out_free;
 
@@ -585,8 +585,9 @@ static __cpuinit int threshold_create_bank(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int bank)
 		if (i == cpu)
 			continue;
 
-		err = sysfs_create_link(&per_cpu(mce_device, i).kobj,
-					b->kobj, name);
+		dev = mce_device[i];
+		if (dev)
+			err = sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj,b->kobj, name);
 		if (err)
 			goto out;
 
@@ -649,6 +650,7 @@ static void deallocate_threshold_block(unsigned int cpu,
 static void threshold_remove_bank(unsigned int cpu, int bank)
 {
 	struct threshold_bank *b;
+	struct device *dev;
 	char name[32];
 	int i = 0;
 
@@ -663,7 +665,7 @@ static void threshold_remove_bank(unsigned int cpu, int bank)
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	/* sibling symlink */
 	if (shared_bank[bank] && b->blocks->cpu != cpu) {
-		sysfs_remove_link(&per_cpu(mce_device, cpu).kobj, name);
+		sysfs_remove_link(&mce_device[cpu]->kobj, name);
 		per_cpu(threshold_banks, cpu)[bank] = NULL;
 
 		return;
@@ -675,7 +677,9 @@ static void threshold_remove_bank(unsigned int cpu, int bank)
 		if (i == cpu)
 			continue;
 
-		sysfs_remove_link(&per_cpu(mce_device, i).kobj, name);
+		dev = mce_device[i];
+		if (dev)
+			sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, name);
 		per_cpu(threshold_banks, i)[bank] = NULL;
 	}
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ