[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1201171037420.12160@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:38:05 +1100 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: keyrings@...ux-nfs.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: Add missing smp_rmb() primitives to the keyring
search code
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, David Howells wrote:
> Add missing smp_rmb() primitives to the keyring search code.
>
Does this need to go into 3.3 and stable?
> When keyring payloads are appended to without replacement (thus using up spare
> slots in the key pointer array), an smp_wmb() is issued between the pointer
> assignment and the increment of the key count (nkeys).
>
> There should be corresponding read barriers between the read of nkeys and
> dereferences of keys[n] when n is dependent on the value of nkeys.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> security/keys/gc.c | 4 +++-
> security/keys/keyring.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/keys/gc.c b/security/keys/gc.c
> index bf4d8da..a42b455 100644
> --- a/security/keys/gc.c
> +++ b/security/keys/gc.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,9 @@ static void key_gc_keyring(struct key *keyring, time_t limit)
> if (!klist)
> goto unlock_dont_gc;
>
> - for (loop = klist->nkeys - 1; loop >= 0; loop--) {
> + loop = klist->nkeys;
> + smp_rmb();
> + for (loop--; loop >= 0; loop--) {
> key = klist->keys[loop];
> if (test_bit(KEY_FLAG_DEAD, &key->flags) ||
> (key->expiry > 0 && key->expiry <= limit))
> diff --git a/security/keys/keyring.c b/security/keys/keyring.c
> index 37a7f3b..d605f75 100644
> --- a/security/keys/keyring.c
> +++ b/security/keys/keyring.c
> @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ key_ref_t keyring_search_aux(key_ref_t keyring_ref,
> struct key *keyring, *key;
> key_ref_t key_ref;
> long err;
> - int sp, kix;
> + int sp, nkeys, kix;
>
> keyring = key_ref_to_ptr(keyring_ref);
> possessed = is_key_possessed(keyring_ref);
> @@ -380,7 +380,9 @@ descend:
> goto not_this_keyring;
>
> /* iterate through the keys in this keyring first */
> - for (kix = 0; kix < keylist->nkeys; kix++) {
> + nkeys = keylist->nkeys;
> + smp_rmb();
> + for (kix = 0; kix < nkeys; kix++) {
> key = keylist->keys[kix];
> kflags = key->flags;
>
> @@ -421,7 +423,9 @@ descend:
> /* search through the keyrings nested in this one */
> kix = 0;
> ascend:
> - for (; kix < keylist->nkeys; kix++) {
> + nkeys = keylist->nkeys;
> + smp_rmb();
> + for (; kix < nkeys; kix++) {
> key = keylist->keys[kix];
> if (key->type != &key_type_keyring)
> continue;
> @@ -515,7 +519,7 @@ key_ref_t __keyring_search_one(key_ref_t keyring_ref,
> struct keyring_list *klist;
> unsigned long possessed;
> struct key *keyring, *key;
> - int loop;
> + int nkeys, loop;
>
> keyring = key_ref_to_ptr(keyring_ref);
> possessed = is_key_possessed(keyring_ref);
> @@ -524,7 +528,9 @@ key_ref_t __keyring_search_one(key_ref_t keyring_ref,
>
> klist = rcu_dereference(keyring->payload.subscriptions);
> if (klist) {
> - for (loop = 0; loop < klist->nkeys; loop++) {
> + nkeys = klist->nkeys;
> + smp_rmb();
> + for (loop = 0; loop < nkeys ; loop++) {
> key = klist->keys[loop];
>
> if (key->type == ktype &&
> @@ -622,7 +628,7 @@ static int keyring_detect_cycle(struct key *A, struct key *B)
>
> struct keyring_list *keylist;
> struct key *subtree, *key;
> - int sp, kix, ret;
> + int sp, nkeys, kix, ret;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
>
> @@ -645,7 +651,9 @@ descend:
>
> ascend:
> /* iterate through the remaining keys in this keyring */
> - for (; kix < keylist->nkeys; kix++) {
> + nkeys = keylist->nkeys;
> + smp_rmb();
> + for (; kix < nkeys; kix++) {
> key = keylist->keys[kix];
>
> if (key == A)
>
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists