lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:59:08 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org,
	acme@...stprotocols.net, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aarapov@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] ftrace, perf: Add filter support for function trace
 event

On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 10:04 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Adding support to filter function trace event via perf
> interface. It is now possible to use filter interface
> in the perf tool like:
> 
>   perf record -e ftrace:function --filter="(ip == mm_*)" ls
> 
> The filter syntax is restricted to the the 'ip' field only,
> and following operators are accepted '==' '!=' '||', ending
> up with the filter strings like:
> 
>   ip == f1[, ]f2 ... || ip != f3[, ]f4 ...
> 
> with comma ',' or space ' ' as a function separator. If the
> space ' ' is used as a separator, the right side of the
> assignment needs to be enclosed in double quotes '"'.
> 
> The '==' operator adds trace filter with same effect as would
> be added via set_ftrace_filter file.
> 
> The '!=' operator adds trace filter with same effect as would
> be added via set_ftrace_notrace file.
> 
> The right side of the '!=', '==' operators is list of functions
> or regexp. to be added to filter separated by space.
> 
> The '||' operator is used for connecting multiple filter definitions
> together. It is possible to have more than one '==' and '!='
> operators within one filter string.

Hate to ask you this, but can you rebase this patch against latest
tip/perf/core? Things have changed that cause this patch not to apply.

I'll go ahead and test your other 6 patches.

Thanks!

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists