[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxZ8dF8WagoyQPYTm92R1ZKd0G_tztqmAc+jrv0LkWGAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:59:41 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Edward Shishkin <edward@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Stop clearing uptodate flag on write IO error
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
>
> Jan is right, Linus. His definition of what up-to-date means for
> dirty buffers is correct, especially in the case of write errors.
It's not a dirty buffer any more.
Go look. We've long since cleared the dirty bit.
So stop spouting garbage.
My argument is simple: the contents ARE NOT CORRECT ENOUGH to be
called "up-to-date and clean".
And I outlined the two choices:
- mark it dirty and continue trying to write it out forever
- invalidate it.
Anything else is crazy talk. And marking it dirty forever isn't really
an option. So..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists