lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120117115705.GD15447@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:27:05 +0530
From:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3.2 7/9] tracing: uprobes trace_event interface

> Srikar, rebased commits like this one:
> 
>   c5af743: rcu: Introduce raw SRCU read-side primitives
> 
> are absolutely inacceptable:
> 

Okay, I wasnt sure whats the best way for me to expose a tree such that
people who just use my tree to try (without basing on any other trees
except Linus) can build and use uprobes but people who already have this
commit arent affected by me having this commit.

So couple of people did tell me that git was intelligent enuf that if
the commit was already in, it would create a empty commit. 

do you have suggestions on how to work around such situations in future?

>  commit c5af7439f322db86e347991e184b95dd80676967
>  Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>  Date:   Sun Oct 9 15:13:11 2011 -0700
> 
>     rcu: Introduce raw SRCU read-side primitives
> 
>     ...
> 
>     Requested-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>     Tested-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> If you pull a commit from Paul into your tree then you must 
> never rebase it. If you applied Paul's commit out of email then 
> you should add a Signed-off-by, not a Tested-by tag at the end.

I actually cherry-picked commit from your tree i.e -tip. 
The Tested-by tag was added by Paul after I confirmed to him that it
works.  Even the commit 0c53dd8b3140: that you refer has the same tags.

> 
> Also, please test whether it works when merged to latest -tip, 
> there's been various RCU changes in this area. AFAICS these 
> read-side primitives are already upstream via:
> 
>   0c53dd8b3140: rcu: Introduce raw SRCU read-side primitives
> 
> so pulling your tree would break the build.

I had used v3.2 as a base for my tree and 0c53dd8b3140: was not part of
that tag. Now that its gone into mainline, I will drop the commit.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ