linux-kernel - Re: x86/mce: machine check warning during poweroff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F15A3A7.5020901@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:06:55 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>
CC:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
	Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	gouders@...bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de,
	Marcos Souza <marcos.mage@...il.com>,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, justinmattock@...il.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
Subject: Re: x86/mce: machine check warning during poweroff

On 01/17/2012 09:45 PM, Jeff Chua wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat
> <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On 01/17/2012 07:51 AM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 08:11 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>>> Of course, the warnings at drivers/base/core.c: device_release()
>>>> as well as the IPI to offline cpu warnings still appear but are rather
>>>> unrelated and harmless to the issue being discussed.
>>>
>>> As far the IPI offline cpu warnings are concerned, appended patch should
>>> fix it. Can you please give it a try? Peterz, can you please review and
>>> queue it after Srivatsa confirms that it works? Thanks.
>>
>>
>> Hi Suresh,
>>
>> Thanks for the patch, but unfortunately it doesn't fix the problem!
>> Exactly the same stack traces are seen during a CPU Hotplug stress test.
>> (I didn't even have to stress it - it is so fragile that just a script
>> to offline all cpus except the boot cpu was good enough to reproduce the
>> problem easily.)
> 
> Works for me. But I'm still seeing this only during boot. Related?
> Shall I bisect?
> 
> 
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 520k freed
> Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 8192k
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 1140k freed
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 464k freed
> Adding 8290300k swap on /dev/sda3.  Priority:-1 extents:1 across:8290300k SS
> vmalloc: allocation failure: 0 bytes


This is a different problem. Not the same as the one Suresh's patch
intended to fix. Your case has something to do with memory allocation
failures. The problem I am facing is Inter-Processor Interrupts (IPIs)
being sent to CPUs that are going offline, after selecting them as the
new ilb (Idle load balancer).

> modprobe: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0xd2
> Pid: 1914, comm: modprobe Not tainted 3.2.0 #6
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8107c1ff>] ? 0xffffffff8107c1ff
> [<ffffffff81061fec>] ? 0xffffffff81061fec
> [<ffffffff8109ab6c>] ? 0xffffffff8109ab6c
> [<ffffffff81061fec>] ? 0xffffffff81061fec
> [<ffffffff8101bacc>] ? 0xffffffff8101bacc
> [<ffffffff81061fec>] ? 0xffffffff81061fec
> [<ffffffff81061fec>] ? 0xffffffff81061fec
> [<ffffffff81062ec8>] ? 0xffffffff81062ec8
> [<ffffffff810637c1>] ? 0xffffffff810637c1
> [<ffffffff814d9cb9>] ? 0xffffffff814d9cb9
> Mem-Info:
> Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
> CPU    0: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
> CPU    1: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
> CPU    2: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
> CPU    3: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
> Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
> CPU    0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 158
> CPU    1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  25
> CPU    2: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:   0
> CPU    3: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:   0
> Node 0 Normal per-cpu:
> CPU    0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  93
> CPU    1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  74
> CPU    2: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 170
> CPU    3: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  60
> active_anon:6162 inactive_anon:1 isolated_anon:0
> active_file:1782 inactive_file:5164 isolated_file:0
> unevictable:0 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0
> free:1963131 slab_reclaimable:818 slab_unreclaimable:2728
> mapped:1639 shmem:3 pagetables:292 bounce:0
> 
>


Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/