[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120117022905.GE24200@somewhere.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:29:09 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org,
acme@...stprotocols.net, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aarapov@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] ftrace: Add enable/disable ftrace_ops control
interface
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:07:35PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 02:42 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> > > index 523640f..0d43a2b 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> > > @@ -35,12 +35,14 @@ enum {
> > > FTRACE_OPS_FL_ENABLED = 1 << 0,
> > > FTRACE_OPS_FL_GLOBAL = 1 << 1,
> > > FTRACE_OPS_FL_DYNAMIC = 1 << 2,
> > > + FTRACE_OPS_FL_CONTROL = 1 << 3,
> >
> > Please comment the role of this flag. In fact it would be nice to have
> > a comment that explains all these. GLOBAL and DYNAMIC don't actually give
> > much clues alone.
>
> Someone else asked about commenting these (was it you?).
Probably, as I asked you the meaning of that GLOBAL on irc :)
> I probably should, as it is confusing to what they are used for.
Yeah that would be nice.
> I just figured every just figures it out by looking at the code ;-)
That's often what happens when the reader of the code is also the writer :)
Also, there is no user that doesn't have FTRACE_OPS_FL_GLOBAL yet, so
it's hard to find a counter example.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists