[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120117164920.GA5111@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:49:20 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pjones@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Re-add ibft tree to linux-next please
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:08:30AM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
>
> > The trick is that we also have to retain the code functionality if
> > "# CONFIG_ACPI is not set" to scan the memory for the iBFT. That part
> > should definitly _not_ be moved to drivers/acpi. It could be moved to
> > arch/x86/ .. but it could also stay in drivers/firmware. <shrugs>
>
>
> Are there really hardware/firmware configurations that support IBFT
> and do not support ACPI?
gPXE can be used in legacy environments. And it (gPXE) does not update
the ACPI tables.
>
> If yes, do they require an OS that has CONFIG_ACPI=n?
I can't think of anybody nowadays doing CONFIG_ACPI=n for x86.
Is there anybody doing it?
> Or would finding the table with CONFIG_ACPI=y and acpi_disabled=1
> be sufficient?
I think that would work. And also if 'acpi_disabled=0' as you might
have an IBFT table in memory that is _not_ hooked up to the ACPI tables.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists