linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: Add devm_regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F15A7D0.1010901@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:54:40 -0800
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Add devm_regulator_get()

On 01/17/12 03:04, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 07:39:58PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> @@ -200,6 +202,11 @@ static inline struct regulator *__must_check regulator_get(struct device *dev,
>>  	 */
>>  	return NULL;
>>  }
>> +static inline struct regulator *__must_check
>> +devm_regulator_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
>> +{
>> +	return NULL;
>> +}
>>  static inline void regulator_put(struct regulator *regulator)
>>  {
>>  }
> Oh, and it's not obvious from the diff but blank lines please like the
> adjacent code.

Should I resend or are you ok with adding the newline there yourself?

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/