linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/15] drivers/dma/pl330.c: add missing iounmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:22:26 +0100 (CET)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
cc:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/15] drivers/dma/pl330.c: add missing iounmap



On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Vinod Koul wrote:

> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 17:55 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>>> Acked by Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...ux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> Which tree is this intended for?
>>
>> It was generated from linux-next, although I'm not sure if that is
>> the
>> intended sense of the question.
> I meant, which tree is this intended to be merged thru?
> slave-dma or any other. Since this is patch is series, typically a
> series is applied thru a single tree. If that is not the case, then I am
> happy to apply thru slave-dma :)

There is no dependency between these patches, so I think you can do 
whatever seems best with respect to this specific change.

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/