[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1326829420.17202.21.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:43:40 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsprintf: Prevent NULL dereference using %pNF
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 20:39 +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:51:13AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 13:46 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> > > Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:37:13 -0800
> > > > Passing NULL to %pNF is done in skb_gso_segment
> > > > which could be dereferenced.
> > > skb_gso_segment() should be fixed instead.
> > Maybe. Dereferencing NULL is bad form.
> > Michał Mirosław should fix that as it's his patch.
>
> Will do. This is in WARN() and easily fixed.
>
> > noinline_for_stack should be added anyway.
>
> Why? There are no local variables there and inlining this function would
> actually save stack space as no stack frame would be created for the call.
Isn't an additional copy of "struct printf_spec spec" on the stack
in function pointer() now?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists