linux-kernel - [PATCH] cleanups in ACPI - removing tboot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1326833408-23685-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:50:06 -0500
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	joseph.cihula@...el.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	tboot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, len.brown@...el.com,
	rjw@...k.pl, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH] cleanups in ACPI - removing tboot_ calls for 3.4 (v1)

I am not really sure if these patches should go through the ACPI or x86 tree.
I think they are more x86-ish related and earlier patches for tboot went through
tip.. Thoughts?

Theset two patches cleanup the ACPI code by removing the 'tboot_sleep'
function call within the ACPI call and instead use a function call.

The function call is set if Intel TXT is detected, otherwise we just skip over
and continue on in hwsleep.c.

Tested on AMD, Intel w/TXT and w/o TXT. Also compile tested on IA64 which has
some reference to tboot but does not use it.

The diff-stat:
 arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c       |    9 ++++++---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.c |   10 +++++++---
 drivers/acpi/osl.c            |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/acpi/acexcep.h        |    1 +
 include/linux/acpi.h          |   10 ++++++++++
 include/linux/tboot.h         |    1 -
 6 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


The purpose of this cleanup is two-fold:
 1). Cleanup the call a bit - that 'tboot_sleep' in ACPICA, which is suppose to be
     OS-agnostic code looks odd.
 2). Piggy-back on the function call if running under Xen [https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/16/447].
     Those patches are still going through review, but the cleanup patches
     can be submitted as standalone.

Thanks! 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/