lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F15EB3E.3060700@oracle.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:42:22 -0800
From:	Tina Yang <tina.yang@...cle.com>
To:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
CC:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gurudas.pai@...cle.com" <gurudas.pai@...cle.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add netconsole support for xen-netfront

On 1/13/2012 3:06 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 14:17 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:52:36PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>>> add polling interface to xen-netfront device to support netconsole
>>>
>> Ian, any thoughts on the spinlock changes?
> What are they for?
When I did this patch back in 2008, both netconsole and netdump
were supported.  Spin_lock w/o irqsave and irqrestore would cause
netdump hang due to the unexpected change of the irq status.
Although netdump is now obsolete, I think it's always a good practice
to preserve caller's irq status as we had a very bad experience
chasing a similar problem caused by such a irq change in RDS
in the not too long ago past.
> At a guess they are a necessary consequence of the new calling context.
> However not all the drivers I looked at which supported netpool were
> using the irqsave variants in this context so I guess it must be some
> secondary effect.
>
> Anyway, the upshot is that I think the changelog needs to explain the
> rationale for the locking change.
>
> Ian.
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tina.Yang<tina.yang@...cle.com>
>>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
>>> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge<jeremy@...p.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong.Duan<zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
>>> Tested-by: gurudas.pai<gurudas.pai@...cle.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/net/xen-netfront.c |   57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>   1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>>> index fa67905..db638b4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>>> @@ -489,6 +489,7 @@ static int xennet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>>   	int frags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
>>>   	unsigned int offset = offset_in_page(data);
>>>   	unsigned int len = skb_headlen(skb);
>>> +	unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>>   	frags += DIV_ROUND_UP(offset + len, PAGE_SIZE);
>>>   	if (unlikely(frags>  MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1)) {
>>> @@ -498,12 +499,12 @@ static int xennet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>>   		goto drop;
>>>   	}
>>>
>>> -	spin_lock_irq(&np->tx_lock);
>>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&np->tx_lock, flags);
>>>
>>>   	if (unlikely(!netif_carrier_ok(dev) ||
>>>   		     (frags>  1&&  !xennet_can_sg(dev)) ||
>>>   		     netif_needs_gso(skb, netif_skb_features(skb)))) {
>>> -		spin_unlock_irq(&np->tx_lock);
>>> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&np->tx_lock, flags);
>>>   		goto drop;
>>>   	}
>>>
>>> @@ -574,7 +575,7 @@ static int xennet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>>   	if (!netfront_tx_slot_available(np))
>>>   		netif_stop_queue(dev);
>>>
>>> -	spin_unlock_irq(&np->tx_lock);
>>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&np->tx_lock, flags);
>>>
>>>   	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>>>
>>> @@ -1228,6 +1229,33 @@ static int xennet_set_features(struct net_device *dev,
>>>   	return 0;
>>>   }
>>>
>>> +static irqreturn_t xennet_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct net_device *dev = dev_id;
>>> +	struct netfront_info *np = netdev_priv(dev);
>>> +	unsigned long flags;
>>> +
>>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&np->tx_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> +	if (likely(netif_carrier_ok(dev))) {
>>> +		xennet_tx_buf_gc(dev);
>>> +		/* Under tx_lock: protects access to rx shared-ring indexes. */
>>> +		if (RING_HAS_UNCONSUMED_RESPONSES(&np->rx))
>>> +			napi_schedule(&np->napi);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&np->tx_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
>>> +static void xennet_poll_controller(struct net_device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +	xennet_interrupt(0, dev);
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>>   static const struct net_device_ops xennet_netdev_ops = {
>>>   	.ndo_open            = xennet_open,
>>>   	.ndo_uninit          = xennet_uninit,
>>> @@ -1239,6 +1267,9 @@ static const struct net_device_ops xennet_netdev_ops = {
>>>   	.ndo_validate_addr   = eth_validate_addr,
>>>   	.ndo_fix_features    = xennet_fix_features,
>>>   	.ndo_set_features    = xennet_set_features,
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
>>> +	.ndo_poll_controller = xennet_poll_controller,
>>> +#endif
>>>   };
>>>
>>>   static struct net_device * __devinit xennet_create_dev(struct xenbus_device *dev)
>>> @@ -1448,26 +1479,6 @@ static int xen_net_read_mac(struct xenbus_device *dev, u8 mac[])
>>>   	return 0;
>>>   }
>>>
>>> -static irqreturn_t xennet_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>> -{
>>> -	struct net_device *dev = dev_id;
>>> -	struct netfront_info *np = netdev_priv(dev);
>>> -	unsigned long flags;
>>> -
>>> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&np->tx_lock, flags);
>>> -
>>> -	if (likely(netif_carrier_ok(dev))) {
>>> -		xennet_tx_buf_gc(dev);
>>> -		/* Under tx_lock: protects access to rx shared-ring indexes. */
>>> -		if (RING_HAS_UNCONSUMED_RESPONSES(&np->rx))
>>> -			napi_schedule(&np->napi);
>>> -	}
>>> -
>>> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&np->tx_lock, flags);
>>> -
>>> -	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>   static int setup_netfront(struct xenbus_device *dev, struct netfront_info *info)
>>>   {
>>>   	struct xen_netif_tx_sring *txs;
>>> -- 
>>> 1.7.3
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ