[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F168A49.8000606@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:00:57 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Petr Matousek <pmatouse@...hat.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 3/4] block: fail SCSI passthrough ioctls on partition
devices
On 01/18/2012 05:47 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Changes with respect to 3.3: return -ENOTTY from scsi_verify_blk_ioctl
> > and -ENOIOCTLCMD from sd_compat_ioctl. ]
>
> But in 2.6.32, compat_sys_ioctl will end up returning EINVAL rather than
> ENOTTY for an unhandled ioctl number.
No, it won't. The ioctl will percolate up the non-compat path and then
sd_ioctl will return ENOTTY.
> Also, since we're denying ioctls
> for security reasons rather than because we don't know how to handle
> them, I don't think there's any harm in doing this.
There is harm. You'll be blacklisting also the standard block device
ioctls, and those won't work on 32-on-64 anymore. A system with 32-bit
userland will likely not boot anymore. This is also somewhat exchanged
in my original exchange with Linus.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists