linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/4] perf/x86-64: "bench mem" improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4F16D6D6020000780006D727@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:27:34 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <mingo@...e.hu>,
	<acme@...stprotocols.net>, <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] perf/x86-64: "bench mem" improvements

In the context of building up confidence in the proposed memset() and
to be proposed memcpy() adjustments (to make them support regions
of 4Gb and more), a number of limitations were found in the current
"bench mem" functionality specific to x86-64. Those are being addressed
in this series:

1: make "default" memcpy() selection actually use glibc's implementation
2: also allow measuring alternative memcpy implementations
3: also allow measuring memset()
4: allow passing an iteration count to "bench mem mem{cpy,set}"

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/