[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLHB=1t=kq2zASjAauFDrZQ5vROpjXs=XaSbmeMnzsaTLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:29:33 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: leonid.moiseichuk@...ia.com, minchan@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, mel@....ul.ie, rientjes@...gle.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...il.com, hannes@...xchg.org, mtosatti@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rhod@...hat.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] /dev/low_mem_notify
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> That seems like a horrible idea, because there is no guarantee that
> the kernel will continue to use NR_ACTIVE_ANON and NR_ACTIVE_FILE
> internally in the future.
>
> What is exported to userspace must be somewhat independent of the
> specifics of how the kernel implements things internally.
Exactly, that's what I'm also interested in.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists