[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF1780DAAE10@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:54:27 -0800
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, "lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
"broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V1 2/2] regulator: tps65910: Initialize n_voltages for
rails.
Laxman Dewangan wrote at Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:17 AM:
> Initializing the number of voltages supported by different
> rails of pmic device tps65911.
...
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c
...
> @@ -188,56 +188,67 @@ static struct tps_info tps65911_regs[] = {
> .name = "VDD1",
> .min_uV = 600000,
> .max_uV = 4500000,
> + .table_len = 73,
> },
Forgive me if these comments are bogus since I'm not familiar with
regulators much, but:
a) Don't you want to use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of hard-coding table_len's
value?
b) Don't you need to set .table to actually point at the table too? If not,
isn't tps65910_list_voltage() going to dereference a NULL pointer, since
it will dereference .table if .table_len is set?
--
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists