[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7vwr8pok7w.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:47:15 -0800
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>
To: Andrew Ardill <andrew.ardill@...il.com>
Cc: git@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using signed tag in pull requests
Andrew Ardill <andrew.ardill@...il.com> writes:
>> Starting from Git release v1.7.9, a contributor can add a signed tag to
>> the commit at the tip of the history and ask the integrator to pull that
>> signed tag. When the integrator runs `git pull`, the signed tag is
>> automatically verified to assure that the history is not tampered with.
>> In addition, the resulting merge commit records the content of the signed
>> tag, so that other people can verify that the branch merged by the
>> contributor was signed by the contributor, without fetching the signed tag
>
> I think you mean to say 'the branch merged by the integrator was signed
> by the contributor'.
Definitely. I'll update my local copy.
Thanks for spotting this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists