linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] ramoops: use pstore interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120118140603.0fc22302.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:06:03 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ramoops: use pstore interface

On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:58:52 -0800
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:

> Instead of using /dev/mem directly and forcing userspace to know (or
> extract) where the platform has defined persistent memory, how many
> slots it has, the sizes, etc, use the common pstore infrastructure to
> handle Oops gathering and extraction. This presents a much easier to
> use filesystem-based view to the memory region. This also means that any
> other tools that are written to understand pstore will automatically be
> able to process ramoops too.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/drivers/char/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/char/Kconfig
> @@ -603,6 +603,7 @@ source "drivers/s390/char/Kconfig"
>  config RAMOOPS
>  	tristate "Log panic/oops to a RAM buffer"
>  	depends on HAS_IOMEM
> +	depends on PSTORE
>  	default n
>  	help
>  	  This enables panic and oops messages to be logged to a circular

I think this is the right thing to do, but boy I hate it.  You sit
there wondering "wtf do I need to enable so I can use feature X".  I
sometimes use menuconfig's search feature, other times go trawl the
Kconfig files.  There should be a capability in Kconfig to just turn on
the terminal feature, enabling any precondition features on the way. 
Everyone loves Kconfig.

>
> ...
>
>  static int __exit ramoops_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> +#if 0
> +	/* TODO(kees): We cannot unload ramoops since pstore doesn't support
> +	 * unregistering yet.
> +	 */

Well that sucks.  Is pstore getting fixed?

>  	struct ramoops_context *cxt = &oops_cxt;
>  
> -	if (kmsg_dump_unregister(&cxt->dump) < 0)
> -		pr_warn("could not unregister kmsg_dumper\n");
> -
>  	iounmap(cxt->virt_addr);
>  	release_mem_region(cxt->phys_addr, cxt->size);
> +	cxt->max_count = 0;
> +
> +	/* TODO(kees): When pstore supports unregistering, call it here. */
> +	kfree(cxt->pstore.buf);
> +	cxt->pstore.bufsize = 0;
> +
>  	return 0;
> +#endif
> +	return -EBUSY;
>  }
>  
>  static struct platform_driver ramoops_driver = {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/