[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F17E2E7.2080300@freescale.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:31:19 +0800
From: Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: <vinod.koul@...el.com>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
<artem.bityutskiy@...el.com>, <b29396@...escale.com>,
<linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<w.sang@...gutronix.de>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<shawn.guo@...aro.org>, <shijie8@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <LW@...O-electronics.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] MXS-DMA : add more flags for MXS-DMA
hi,
> Err, the 'flags' argument to device_prep_slave_sg() is supposed to be
> from the set of enum dma_ctrl_flags. What this means is that your
> MXS_DMA_F_APPEND is equivalent to DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT, and
> MXS_DMA_F_WAIT4END is equivalent to DMA_CTRL_ACK.
>
thanks a lot.
I will reuse the dma_ctrl_flags in the next version.
> What this does is make your drivers completely dependent on your DMA
> engine implementation. That's not a good idea when devices get
> reused in different SoCs.
>
Frankly speaking, the APBH-DMA is more coupled with the GPMI then any
other modules.
In the MX6Q, the GPMI is the ONLY user of APBH-DMA.
You even can see the NAND_LOCK bit in the DMA command structure which is
only used by the GPMI
NAND controller,.
To Shawn & Wolfram:
thanks very much for your comments.
Best Regards
Huang Shijie
> If you need to supply extra flags which aren't in the dma_ctrl_flags,
> at least make sure that they're using different bits. For bonus points,
> also have your driver_check_ the DMA engine it's connected to before
> it passes these flags.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists