[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96C9D994977DD0439FB6D3FE3B13DD907DC3DCC2B6@BGMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:25:17 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>, "lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V1 2/2] regulator: tps65910: Initialize n_voltages for
rails.
On Thursday 19 January 2012 04:10 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Do you want to rename the variable in this patch or in separate patch?
> > In place of table_len, I will say n_voltages as this is most common name
> > in regulator world.
>
> Probably two is clearer, though if it's not set already for any of the
> regulators just one should be fine.
The table_len is already used in some of entry i.e. for tps65910. I filled
entry for another device tps65911. So I would like to go for separate patch
for renaming the variables "table" to "voltage_table" and "table_len" to
"n_voltages".
Please let me know your opinion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists