[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120119130404.GI2247@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:04:06 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com>
Cc: vinod.koul@...el.com, artem.bityutskiy@...el.com,
shijie8@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, w.sang@...gutronix.de,
LW@...O-electronics.de, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
b29396@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] MXS-DMA : move the mxs-dma.h to a more common place
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 02:15:58PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> Move the header to a more common place.
> The DMA engine is not only used in mx23/mx28, but also used
> in mx50/mx6q.
> It will also be used in the future chips.
>
> Rename it to mxs-dma.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/dma.h | 28 ----------------------------
> include/linux/mxs-dma.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/dma.h
> create mode 100644 include/linux/mxs-dma.h
>
I'm wondering if it would be better to create folder include/linux/fsl
for mxs-dma.h accommodation, so that any headers that need to shared
between mxs and imx later can find a place. Considering that Freescale
has many IPs shared between MPCxxx (PowerPC) and i.MX (ARM) families,
it could also be a good place for any headers that need to be shared
between these two product lines from Freescale.
--
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists