[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120119175700.GA19627@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:57:00 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Andrew Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs, proc: Introduce /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children
entry v7
On 01/19, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 07:51:12PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > If it's needed I can wrap all this with CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE, should I?
> >
> > ---
>
> Oleg, if only I'm not missing something obvious you meant handling like below?
Yes, but...
> +struct proc_pid_children_iter {
> + struct pid_namespace *pid_ns;
> + struct pid *parent_pid;
> +};
you forgot to remove this definition.
> +static int children_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = seq->private;
> + unsigned long pid;
> +
> + pid = (unsigned long)pid_nr_ns(v, inode->i_sb->s_fs_info);
> + return seq_printf(seq, " %lu", pid);
> +}
just noticed... why unsigned long and %lu? afaics pid_t/%d should work
without any typecasts.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists