[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F186C62.6000606@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:17:54 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Michael D Labriola <mlabriol@...b.com>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Kushal Koolwal <kushalkoolwal@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, michael.d.labriola@...il.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, support@...salogic.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, reboot: skip DMI checks if reboot set by user
On 01/19/2012 11:14 AM, Michael D Labriola wrote:
>>
>> Yes, and such a patch would be appreciated.
>>
>> The reason it is as it is dates back to before the 32-64 bit
>> unification, as far as I know.
>>
>> (BIOS reboot is currently not supported on 64 bits, mainly.)
>
> Well, that does complicate it a bit. I'll gin something up and see what
> you think. I guess it will involve having an #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 block
> inside a single dmi_table structure for the BIOS quirks.
>
> Actually, set_kbd_reboot is inside the current X86_32 only block, along
> with the one DMI callback that uses it. Is this correct?
>
Probably not, although I suspect most of the users of that are 32-bit
only systems.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists