linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/3] cgroup: revert ss_id

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1201191249000.29542@eggly.anvils>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:50:10 -0800 (PST)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] cgroup: revert ss_id_lock to spinlock

Commit c1e2ee2dc436 "memcg: replace ss->id_lock with a rwlock" has
now been seen to cause the unfair behavior we should have expected
from converting a spinlock to an rwlock: softlockup in cgroup_mkdir(),
whose get_new_cssid() is waiting for the wlock, while there are 19
tasks using the rlock in css_get_next() to get on with their memcg
workload (in an artificial test, admittedly).  Yet lib/idr.c was
made suitable for RCU way back: revert that commit, restoring
ss->id_lock to a spinlock.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
---
 include/linux/cgroup.h |    2 +-
 kernel/cgroup.c        |   18 +++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- 3.2.0+.orig/include/linux/cgroup.h	2012-01-14 13:01:57.000000000 -0800
+++ 3.2.0+/include/linux/cgroup.h	2012-01-19 12:14:47.420233522 -0800
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ struct cgroup_subsys {
 	struct list_head sibling;
 	/* used when use_id == true */
 	struct idr idr;
-	rwlock_t id_lock;
+	spinlock_t id_lock;
 
 	/* should be defined only by modular subsystems */
 	struct module *module;
--- 3.2.0+.orig/kernel/cgroup.c	2012-01-14 13:01:57.000000000 -0800
+++ 3.2.0+/kernel/cgroup.c	2012-01-19 12:16:04.132235263 -0800
@@ -4939,9 +4939,9 @@ void free_css_id(struct cgroup_subsys *s
 
 	rcu_assign_pointer(id->css, NULL);
 	rcu_assign_pointer(css->id, NULL);
-	write_lock(&ss->id_lock);
+	spin_lock(&ss->id_lock);
 	idr_remove(&ss->idr, id->id);
-	write_unlock(&ss->id_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&ss->id_lock);
 	kfree_rcu(id, rcu_head);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(free_css_id);
@@ -4967,10 +4967,10 @@ static struct css_id *get_new_cssid(stru
 		error = -ENOMEM;
 		goto err_out;
 	}
-	write_lock(&ss->id_lock);
+	spin_lock(&ss->id_lock);
 	/* Don't use 0. allocates an ID of 1-65535 */
 	error = idr_get_new_above(&ss->idr, newid, 1, &myid);
-	write_unlock(&ss->id_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&ss->id_lock);
 
 	/* Returns error when there are no free spaces for new ID.*/
 	if (error) {
@@ -4985,9 +4985,9 @@ static struct css_id *get_new_cssid(stru
 	return newid;
 remove_idr:
 	error = -ENOSPC;
-	write_lock(&ss->id_lock);
+	spin_lock(&ss->id_lock);
 	idr_remove(&ss->idr, myid);
-	write_unlock(&ss->id_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&ss->id_lock);
 err_out:
 	kfree(newid);
 	return ERR_PTR(error);
@@ -4999,7 +4999,7 @@ static int __init_or_module cgroup_init_
 {
 	struct css_id *newid;
 
-	rwlock_init(&ss->id_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&ss->id_lock);
 	idr_init(&ss->idr);
 
 	newid = get_new_cssid(ss, 0);
@@ -5094,9 +5094,9 @@ css_get_next(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, i
 		 * scan next entry from bitmap(tree), tmpid is updated after
 		 * idr_get_next().
 		 */
-		read_lock(&ss->id_lock);
+		spin_lock(&ss->id_lock);
 		tmp = idr_get_next(&ss->idr, &tmpid);
-		read_unlock(&ss->id_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&ss->id_lock);
 
 		if (!tmp)
 			break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/