[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120119222101.GA4929@fieldses.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:21:01 -0500
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
Cc: "Trond.Myklebust@...app.com" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] SUNRPC: ip map cache per network namespace cleanup
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 09:10:08PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> 19.01.2012 20:37, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> >On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 06:49:31PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> >>This patch converts ip_map_cache per network namespace implemenetation to the
> >>same view, as other caches done in the series.
> >>Besides generalization, code becomes shorter with this patch.
> >
> >Again, isnt' it ip_map_cache, and not one of the dynamically created
> >cache details, that's being passed to the lookup routines?
> >
> >I may just be confused....
> >
>
> Nope. ip_map_cache was made per network namespace a long time ago.
> But it was done in other way: no static templates - just allocation
> and initialization.
> But static template looks clearer to me. So I've used this approach
> for other caches. And decided to update ip_map_cache management in
> the same way.
Going and reading the code.... OK, I see what you mean, makes sense.
Thanks!
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists