linux-kernel - Re: rcu_sched_state detected stalls on Alpha with generic config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120119233927.GH2373@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:39:27 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
Subject: Re: rcu_sched_state detected stalls on Alpha with generic config

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:15:18PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> On 8/12/2011, at 2:16 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 07:51:23PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> >>I am seeing "rcu_sched_state detected stall on CPU" messages on Alpha
> >>architecture with a generic SMP config.  Interactive tasks are
> >>seen to
> >>lock up, with "INFO: task X blocked for more than 120 seconds" in the
> >>kernel logs, and eventual kernel oops and panic, on latest
> >>3.2-rc4 and
> >>traceable back to 3.0.  Bisection between 2.6.39 and 3.0 leads
> >>to commit:
> >>
> >>09223371deac67d08ca0b70bd18787920284c967
> >>rcu: Use softirq to address performance regression
> >>
> >>as the first bad commit.
> >>
> >>Tested on an Alpha ES45 (Titan) with three 1.25 GHz CPUs and 4 GByte
> >>memory.  Testing procedure is to build git software and run its test
> >>suite with -j4 in the make command argument.
> >>
> >>The CPU stall messages and eventually system lockup is only seen
> >>with a
> >>generic Alpha config, never with a Titan machine specific config.
> >>
> >>An example of kernel logs is (this one probably produced when I
> >>tried to
> >>shutdown the system when it is falling over):
> >>
> >>[45360.930876] INFO: rcu_sched_state detected stall on CPU 1
> >>(t=798848
> >>jiffies)
> >>[45360.931853] INFO: rcu_sched_state detected stalls on
> >>CPUs/tasks: { 1}
> >>(detected by 0, t=798850 jiffies)
> >>[45489.080225] INFO: task umount:17371 blocked for more than 120
> >>seconds.
> >>[45489.158350] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
> >>disables this message.
> >>[45489.252100] umount          D fffffc00013461ac     0 17371  17368
> >>0x00000000
> >>[45489.336084] fffffc00fdd53db8 fffffc00fdd97bb8 fffffc000108ca1c
> >>fffffc00dcc9e800
> >>[45489.422998]        fffffc00dcc9e810 fffffc00013b3a5d
> >>fffffc000106289c
> >>fffffc00ff0dfda8
> >>[45489.519678]        0000000000000000 fffffc000108c81c
> >>fffffc0001cd73f0
> >>0000000000000001
> >>[45489.615381]        fffffc00010627f0 0000000000000000
> >>fffffc00dcc9e920
> >>fffffc00ff0bf780
> >>[45489.712060]        fffffc00010111b8 fffffc00ff0dfda8
> >>fffffc00ff0dfde8
> >>fffffc0001cdaa58
> >>[45489.808740]        0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> >>fffffc0000000000
> >>fffffc0000000000
> >>[45489.907373] Trace:
> >>[45489.930810] [<fffffc000108ca1c>] watchdog+0x200/0x27c
> >>[45489.991357] [<fffffc000106289c>] kthread+0xac/0xc4
> >>[45490.048974] [<fffffc000108c81c>] watchdog+0x0/0x27c
> >>[45490.107568] [<fffffc00010627f0>] kthread+0x0/0xc4
> >>[45490.164209] [<fffffc00010111b8>] kernel_thread+0x28/0x90
> >>[45490.227685]
> >>
> >>Let me know if any other information is needed to narrow down
> >>the problem.
> >
> >Are there any specific differences between the Titan config and the
> >generic Alpha config that might help me work out what is going on?
> >Odd -- it looks like the watchdog is complaining at the time of
> >the hang.
> >Is it possible to use sysrq to get the state of the other tasks?
> 
> Been rather busy or on holiday in the meantime, but just got back to
> looking at this problem.
> 
> It looks like it is a faulty compiler, not a problem in the kernel
> source.
> 
> The problems described above are seen when compiling with gcc-4.4
> and we now realise that gcc-4.4 has an optimisation problem on Alpha
> and is the cause of reported problems/crashes in software other than
> the kernel.  These problems are fixed when compiling with gcc-4.5.
> 
> I have now compiled a "bad" kernel with gcc-4.5 and I no longer can
> trigger the failure --- the kernel worked for a couple of hours (and
> a bad one compiled with gcc-4.4 has never lasted that long without
> crashing!).

Thank you for letting me know -- always glad to blame the compiler.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/