[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F194B5D.6080701@parallels.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:09:17 +0400
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 (mm/memcontrol.c)
On 01/20/2012 04:00 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:35:03 -0800
> Randy Dunlap<rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
>
>> On 01/18/2012 05:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20120118:
>>
>>
>> on i386:
>>
>> mm/built-in.o:(__jump_table+0x8): undefined reference to `memcg_socket_limit_enabled'
>> mm/built-in.o:(__jump_table+0x14): undefined reference to `memcg_socket_limit_enabled'
>>
>>
>> Full randconfig file is attached.
>>
>
> Thank you. Forwarding this to Costa.
>
> Thanks,
> -Kame
>
Oh dear lord... So what happened here, is that I moved this code out of
CONFIG_INET to fix another problem, and forgot that it needed to be
wrapped under CONFIG_NET instead.
It is not an excuse, but I did compiled it over at least 6 random
configs, and thought it was okay. I guess so many things select
CONFIG_NET that it ends up being hard to generate a config without it.
I think the fix for this needs to go through dave's tree, since it is
where the original fix went through.
I will send a fix shortly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists