linux-kernel - Re: AHCI_SHT(), ATA_BASE_SHT() and .can

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120120173604.GD3336@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:36:04 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: AHCI_SHT(), ATA_BASE_SHT() and .can_queue

Hello,

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 05:04:21PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> I guess the fact that can_queue is specified twice and with different
> values in AHCI_SHT() was unintentional ?

Yes, it is intentional.  The macros provide default values which
specific drivers or downstream class of drivers may choose to
override.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/