linux-kernel - Re: /etc/fstab.d yes or not

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPXgP13GOehS3rKM2oYs18aGTpt0KPyG5RRkJL803kUxA3xb=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:29:21 +0100
From:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Cc:	Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, util-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /etc/fstab.d yes or not

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 19:20, Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com> wrote:
>>  BTW, systemd allows to define addition mountpoints in
>>  systemd.mount(5) unit file(s), so we already have additional place
>>  for fstab stuff...
>
> systemd needs a large blunt object be stuck into its eye.
>
> systemd was supposed to be an init replacement.

It's much more, and I don't think you have been involved in defining
the focus of it, and the systemd people do not necessary come to the
same conclusion as you.

> Its continuing attempts to infiltrate entire system
> are very worrying.

You are free to express your worries somewhere else. Don't hijack
treads with completely unrelated stuff. That's not welcome in this
thread and not in general.

> What a *heck* is this?

A platform.

Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/