linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: fix socket memcg build with !CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120120.141446.136970067758991080.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:14:46 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	glommer@...allels.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: fix socket memcg build with !CONFIG_NET

From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:57:14 +0400

> There is still a build bug with the sock memcg code, that triggers
> with !CONFIG_NET, that survived my series of randconfig builds.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>

Why are you undoing the static branch optimization?  That was a one of
the things that made me agree to even putting this code in.

Find a way to fix this without removing the static branch.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/