linux-kernel - Re: Regression tracking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120122.150707.1411449164435920150.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:07:07 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	maciej.rutecki@...il.com
Cc:	davej@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: Regression tracking

From: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:52:02 +0100

> OK. But tracking regressions in two (or more) places is nonsense. And this 
> puts into question all of my current work, such as how to analyze 
> (automatically) the progress of the whole kernel and its quality per each -rc. 
> Problem to discussion, but if everyone will do as you wish, it will all work 
> went to waste.

If someone else wants to maintain the state of bugs on some web
site and click buttons all day long, that is their perogative.

But it's not something I'm going to do.

You can't force people to use tools, and frankly that's the end of
this conversation as far as I'm concerned.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/