lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1327202725-3383-10-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:25:17 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	axboe@...nel.dk, vgoyal@...hat.com
Cc:	ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/17] blkcg: move rcu_read_lock() outside of blkio_group get functions

rcu_read_lock() in throtl_get_tb() and cfq_get_cfqg() holds onto
@blkcg while looking up blkg.  For API cleanup, the next patch will
make the caller responsible for determining @blkcg to look blkg from
and let them specify it as a parameter.  Move rcu read locking out to
the callers to prepare for the change.

-v2: Originally this patch was described as a fix for RCU read locking
     bug around @blkg, which Vivek pointed out to be incorrect.  It
     was from misunderstanding the role of rcu locking as protecting
     @blkg not @blkcg.  Patch description updated.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
---
 block/blk-throttle.c |   18 ++++++------------
 block/cfq-iosched.c  |   11 +++++------
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
index 3bc1cc9..16fb95b 100644
--- a/block/blk-throttle.c
+++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
@@ -313,25 +313,23 @@ static struct throtl_grp * throtl_get_tg(struct throtl_data *td)
 	if (unlikely(blk_queue_bypass(q)))
 		return NULL;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	blkcg = task_blkio_cgroup(current);
 	tg = throtl_find_tg(td, blkcg);
-	if (tg) {
-		rcu_read_unlock();
+	if (tg)
 		return tg;
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Need to allocate a group. Allocation of group also needs allocation
 	 * of per cpu stats which in-turn takes a mutex() and can block. Hence
 	 * we need to drop rcu lock and queue_lock before we call alloc.
 	 */
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	tg = throtl_alloc_tg(td);
 
 	/* Group allocated and queue is still alive. take the lock */
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
 
 	/* Make sure @q is still alive */
@@ -343,7 +341,6 @@ static struct throtl_grp * throtl_get_tg(struct throtl_data *td)
 	/*
 	 * Initialize the new group. After sleeping, read the blkcg again.
 	 */
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	blkcg = task_blkio_cgroup(current);
 
 	/*
@@ -354,7 +351,6 @@ static struct throtl_grp * throtl_get_tg(struct throtl_data *td)
 
 	if (__tg) {
 		kfree(tg);
-		rcu_read_unlock();
 		return __tg;
 	}
 
@@ -365,7 +361,6 @@ static struct throtl_grp * throtl_get_tg(struct throtl_data *td)
 	}
 
 	throtl_init_add_tg_lists(td, tg, blkcg);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return tg;
 }
 
@@ -1134,7 +1129,6 @@ bool blk_throtl_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 	 * basic fields like stats and io rates. If a group has no rules,
 	 * just update the dispatch stats in lockless manner and return.
 	 */
-
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	blkcg = task_blkio_cgroup(current);
 	tg = throtl_find_tg(td, blkcg);
@@ -1144,11 +1138,9 @@ bool blk_throtl_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 		if (tg_no_rule_group(tg, rw)) {
 			blkiocg_update_dispatch_stats(&tg->blkg, bio->bi_size,
 					rw, rw_is_sync(bio->bi_rw));
-			rcu_read_unlock();
-			goto out;
+			goto out_unlock_rcu;
 		}
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	/*
 	 * Either group has not been allocated yet or it is not an unlimited
@@ -1206,6 +1198,8 @@ queue_bio:
 
 out_unlock:
 	spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+out_unlock_rcu:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 out:
 	return throttled;
 }
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index b110cd8..1cc3392 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -1128,13 +1128,10 @@ static struct cfq_group *cfq_get_cfqg(struct cfq_data *cfqd)
 	struct cfq_group *cfqg = NULL, *__cfqg = NULL;
 	struct request_queue *q = cfqd->queue;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	blkcg = task_blkio_cgroup(current);
 	cfqg = cfq_find_cfqg(cfqd, blkcg);
-	if (cfqg) {
-		rcu_read_unlock();
+	if (cfqg)
 		return cfqg;
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Need to allocate a group. Allocation of group also needs allocation
@@ -1164,7 +1161,6 @@ static struct cfq_group *cfq_get_cfqg(struct cfq_data *cfqd)
 
 	if (__cfqg) {
 		kfree(cfqg);
-		rcu_read_unlock();
 		return __cfqg;
 	}
 
@@ -1172,7 +1168,6 @@ static struct cfq_group *cfq_get_cfqg(struct cfq_data *cfqd)
 		cfqg = &cfqd->root_group;
 
 	cfq_init_add_cfqg_lists(cfqd, cfqg, blkcg);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return cfqg;
 }
 
@@ -2870,6 +2865,8 @@ cfq_find_alloc_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd, bool is_sync,
 	struct cfq_group *cfqg;
 
 retry:
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
 	cfqg = cfq_get_cfqg(cfqd);
 	cic = cfq_cic_lookup(cfqd, ioc);
 	/* cic always exists here */
@@ -2885,6 +2882,7 @@ retry:
 			cfqq = new_cfqq;
 			new_cfqq = NULL;
 		} else if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) {
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 			spin_unlock_irq(cfqd->queue->queue_lock);
 			new_cfqq = kmem_cache_alloc_node(cfq_pool,
 					gfp_mask | __GFP_ZERO,
@@ -2910,6 +2908,7 @@ retry:
 	if (new_cfqq)
 		kmem_cache_free(cfq_pool, new_cfqq);
 
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return cfqq;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.7.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ