linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] staging: zsmalloc: zsmalloc memory allocation library

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:36:06 -0600
From:	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
	Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] staging: zsmalloc: zsmalloc memory allocation library

Hey Andrew, 

Thanks again for responding.

On 01/20/2012 04:12 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon,  9 Jan 2012 16:51:56 -0600
> Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> This patch creates a new memory allocation library named
>> zsmalloc.
> 
> I haven't really begun to look at this yet.  The code is using many
> fields of struct page in new ways.  This is key information for anyone
> to effectively review the code.  So please carefully document (within
> the code itself) the ways in which the various page fields are used:
> semantic meaning of the overload, relationships between them, any
> locking rules or assumptions.

Will do.

> It appears that a pile of dead code will be generated if CPU hotplug is
> disabled.  (That's if it compiles at all!).  Please take a look at users
> of hotcpu_notifier() - this facility cunningly causes all the hotplug code
> to vanish from vmlinux if it is unneeded.

I'll take a look at hotcpu_notifier() users.  Thanks.

> afacit this code should be added to core mm/.  Addition of code like
> this to core mm/ will be fiercely resisted on principle!  Hence the
> (currently missing) justifications for adding it had best be good ones.

Thanks for the insight.  I'll put some work into spelling out the benefits
this code provides that are not currently provided by any other code in the
kernel right now (afaik).

If you think this belongs in mm/ then disregard my previous comment in
the response to the cover letter.  I guess I was leaning toward putting it
in lib/ specifically because I knew that it would be hard to get it into mm/.

Thanks
--
Seth

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/