| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120123161619.GE12652@google.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:16:19 -0800 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] blkcg: shoot down blkio_groups on elevator switch On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:10:42AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > This does not work well in hierachical management/scenario. Think that > a user gets an upper limit of 10MB/s on a device and now user can manage > its own children groups and divide allocated 10MB/s in children the way > he wants. > > Now if root does the elevator switch, and saves all the rules (including > user's rules) and then restores back, these can very well race with > user's scripts of changing rules. If user changed a cgroup device rule > during elevator switch and after elevator switch root restored back > old rules, user's new rule will be lost leading to confusion. It simply doesn't matter. Just declare elvswitch and policy change reset blkcg configurations. If some people are crazy enough to switch elevators regularly with full system running and parallel configuration going on, let them deal with synchronizing their scripts. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists