[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFz=KcR5ji3TBHyfAYxFg8PCjXbdLOWf7aXULYHW4pp2kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:57:10 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...allels.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...radead.org,
hpa@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NVMe: Fix compilation on architecturs without readq/writeq
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I wrote the patch which adds the new file include/asm-generic/io-nonatomic.h.
> io-nonatomic.h provides non-atomic version readq()/writeq().
I do wonder if we should do "little-endian" and "big-endian" variations?
Quoting Willy:
"For this particular hardware, it's defined to work if you read the
low order bits first"
so I think we need make that explicit, and make two include files:
include/asm-generic/io-64b-lo-hi.h
include/asm-generic/io-64b-hi-lo.h
or something like that. And thus indirectly document these kinds of
requirements.
Hmm?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists